Why is have to usually pronounced half to?

asked 2017-07-21 04:35:21 -0500

PDub
1 ●1 ●1 ●1

I've noticed that many (most?) people pronounce "have to" as "half to" or "hafta." Why is this? Is it peculiar to [North] American speech or does it occur in other varieties of English? I'm having difficulty thinking of other cases where v is pronounced as f. Is there a name for this phenomenon?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

add a comment

2 answers

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2017-11-30 08:05:57 -0500

splash
1

... yeah, terminal devoicing with partial regressive assimilation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final-o....

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

answered 2017-11-09 15:35:18 -0500

Raccoon
1

I'm not an expert on English, but it looks like partial regressive assimilation – essentially, the [v] sound becomes more similar to the [t] sound that follows it.

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2017-07-21 04:35:21 -0500

Seen: 2,151 times

Last updated: Jul 21 '17

(C) 2015 by The LINGUIST List and Contributors
Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.

Why is have to usually pronounced half to? edit

2 answers

Question Tools

Stats

Why is have to usually pronounced half to?