Ask Your Question
0

Which is more effective in teaching grammar to L2 learners, implicit or explicit approach?

asked 2015-05-19 09:24:55 -0400

Bernadette gravatar image

Implicit vs. Explicit Approach

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

2 answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2015-05-19 09:54:25 -0400

Research says explicit, followed by communicative application of rules. Context however is very influential. in England, secondary MFL, participant teachers fully supported in their CLIL approach were observed sustaining explicit metalinguistic activities in the target language, effectively conducting both implicit and explicit focus on form. Interestingly, two were observed in a selective school, and one in an inner London comprehensive. Multicultural context were their only common feature. I have just completed a PhD on this topic. Liviero, 2014; Exeter.ac.uk ORE repository

edit flag offensive delete link more
0

answered 2015-05-25 11:36:43 -0400

usagi5886 gravatar image

One often-cited study supporting the view that explicit is better is Norris and Ortega (2000):

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0023-8333.00136/abstract

However, I think that we shouldn't take this to mean we should only do 100% explicit and 0% implicit. There are pros and cons to both, and so the best kind of teaching should try to strike a balance between the two. In thinking through these issues, you might find these articles useful:

  • languagelinks2006.wikispaces.com/Implicit+vs.+Explicit+Teaching
  • eslbase.com/articles/grammar-implicit-explicit
  • myenglishpages.com/blog/explicit-implicit-grammar-teaching/
edit flag offensive delete link more
Login/Signup to Answer

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2015-05-19 09:24:55 -0400

Seen: 10,053 times

Last updated: May 25 '15