What would be an efficient approach to furthering understandings of complex representations of sets of ideas like faith and how they relate to our perception and thinking.

asked 2016-08-25 10:46:02 -0400

My name is Joshua. I have no college experience, and no exposure whatsoever to academia. But I do have a passion for the truth, that is, an accurate depiction of the events of reality. An intimate component of such being, certain personal and social structures with intents that can help or hinder the harmony of humanity as a whole with careful manipulation of reality. (For example: It seems to be a natural response to weigh the cost of overanalyzing something that only needs to be understood functionally with the cost of risking some personal priority, perceived risk of status, authority or respect. And this type of social interaction, I believe, can model introspective interaction as well in the sense that if you were to lose authority or belief in your own intention or competency, that this will result in a chaotic situation where ignorance would lead to doubt and thus lead to lack of faith in oneself, and/or the ability of oneself in terms of intellectual or moral strength. So then the incapability of representing a more complete perception of the involved factors as a whole, in what would be a more ideal interaction with ones environment, stunts the progressive intent for a truer reality with the intention of maintaining or retaining personal or social peace. This would be a case of a personal structure facilitating internal harmony. At least probably, or hopefully anyway.)

This is a very general way of speaking and I don't necessarily expect an Exact answer as the preface may suggest. In the realm of cognitive science, linguistics, or any title given the type of search for representational models that correspond to human perception, there seems to be an inherent difficulty in developing a method with which to facilitate the representation of matters of real internal and external behavioral interaction. My question is simple, but not really.

What would be an efficient approach to furthering understandings of complex representations of sets of ideas like faith and how they relate to our perception and thinking? If you were to take 3 moments and define the length of those moments by "The point at which a specific abstract perception that can be described as its own unit, and a set of all of the seemingly infinite ways that it can potentially be related to other ideas, and thus a subset of many other specifically related sets of this type that evolve from birth to provide more proficient functionality, through the point at which a new abstraction, however intricately related to the first and the current process of some goal or intention that is attempted to be used functionally, first appears in the sense of awareness."(Taking for granted what must be a process of identifying the emotional quality that correlates with the idea that precedes its visualization.) And if you were to presume that these lengths only serve to describe a chronological relation between ideas and that they doesn't necessarily signify any other similarities that ... (more)

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete